HOW-OF-WHY

Friday, June 17, 2005

 

THE WHY OF HOW – MIDSTREAM 2005

© 2005 Michael John Moynihan

"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas.
I'm frightened of the old ones."
– John Cage

"I am always doing that which I cannot do, in order that I may learn how to do it."
– Pablo Picasso
Almost summertime, and a few years into this new century. What better time to attempt to clarify THE WHY OF HOW. What is the purpose of calling a monthly column THE WHY OF HOW? Stay with me here.

HOW we do things is very important. Part of any discussion or proposition involves HOW something is created, HOW it works, HOW you and I can master it. But HOW is always a secondary understanding. Its a good question, an important question. Its also a question that should not even be asked until the most important, primary question is answered. WHY?

WHY is always the first and most important question. HOW is meaningless and silly unless we know WHY. HOW will be determined by the answer to WHY. Leave out WHY and you create HOWS that are at best useless, at worst, ignorantly destructive.

Lets look at several examples. Take education. Please. Public schools, school choice, charter schools, for profit schools, vouchers – all of these are HOWS, none of them are WHYS. And so the entire school/education debate in Milwaukee (and the nation) is basically useless at this point, because we have not started out by asking the very simple all–important first question: Why do we want to educate our children, here and now at the beginning of the 21st century. To be compliant and productive future workers? To be curious adults and life long learners? To be critical, intelligent and informed citizens of a democratic republic? To keep young children and adolescents out of the job market until they reach a specific age? To sort and authorize children according to intelligence, talent or class? To help all children reach the optimum potential as individuals and members of society. Advocates of educator John Dewey will have quite different answers than most members of a chamber of commerce. There are many possible answers, but since educational policy and process is public and societal, we have to come to some agreement on WHY. Once that is agreed upon we could try all the HOWS we could think of as long as they supported the WHY. But first we must ask WHY.

How about Politics. WHY make politics the main way we determine public policy. Given that we can all observe and study history, its not hard to make a case that the WHY of politics is and always will be the seizure and maintenance of power. Is that compatible with the WHY of social order, economic stability or cultural progress in a democratic republic?

It should not be hard to see that we, as a people, have confused HOW with WHY. Many of our best and brightest only talk about HOW, never venturing into the realm of WHY. It is as if we assume that the WHYS are all a given, worked out by our ancestors. Of course that is nonsense. Each generation, each culture, each individual needs to ask WHY anew. Actually asking WHY every seven years or so is the most functional way of keeping any organization or association alive and vital.

So, WHY the present electoral process? What is the overall purpose of the process in light of the relatively new and rapidly converging and developing technologies? What purpose could print, broadcast, cable, satellite TV and the Internet, be in the electoral process? To merely sell the attention of the viewer to the highest party or corporate bidder. Or should the HOW of this unprecedented set of advanced communications technologies serve a less pedestrian, more democratic, more socially progressive, more ecologically sustaining, more educational and more humanly scaled guiding ideal? Mass communications as it now is commercially employed primarily sorts and markets human attention for a reductive industry called Marketing. What would it look and sound like if its main purpose was to interconnect the minds of people in order to advance human understanding, wisdom and progress?

Pick any topic of public concern and apply the WHY/HOW equation. The viability of the human race is now in question largely because of HOW we employ our extraordinary abilities to create and apply technologies. It is high time for every discussion to begin with the question WHY.

Comments: Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home

Archives

May 2005   June 2005   October 2005   November 2005   January 2006   May 2006   June 2006   August 2006   September 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   September 2007   October 2007   December 2007   January 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   April 2009   September 2009   August 2010   January 2011   March 2011   April 2011   July 2011   October 2011   January 2012   June 2013   July 2013   September 2013   January 2014   April 2014   May 2014   June 2014   July 2014   August 2014   September 2014   October 2014   March 2015   January 2016   February 2016  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]